From the advent of the analog camera to wide spread use today of the digital camera, use of photography has long been the backbone of the trial lawyer in the courtroom. Sadly, it was not long ago that judges routinely prohibited the use of certain photographs at trial on grounds of prejudice. This is especially so where the photograph graphically captures a horrific injury sustained by a plaintiff. Fortunately, today this preclusive prejudice is encountered with less frequency.

Indeed, digital photography today is extremely assistive to the jury. As above, a picture is worth a thousand words. Where different parts of that picture can be “zoomed,” thanks to digital technology, matters not previously viewed with clarity can now be seen with ease.

Not surprisingly, most California Highway Patrol officers now carry digital cameras in their cruisers. Officers routinely and extensively photograph accident scenes. Witnesses with cell phone cameras have become extremely helpful in the reconstruction of wrecks and crashes. Video cameras in public are often key to proof in all types of cases!

What follows below are examples of different photographs utilized by the Scarlett Law Group at trial.

Aerial photos are a very important piece of evidence in any automobile crash or other personal injury case. We prepare for and go through trial telling our client’s story so the jury can truly understand what that client went through. As in any story, the setting is essential to gaining context and connecting with the characters involved. Use of aerial photography allows the jury to gain that context and connect with our client. Pictured below are just some examples of aerial photography recently used by the Scarlett Law Group.